Quigg Partners  
NZ Mergers & Acquisitions

December 2006


david quigg
David Quigg
davidquigg@quiggpartners.com
 
   
john horner    
John Horner
johnhorner@quiggpartners.com
 
   
matt yates   
Matt Yates
mattyates@quiggpartners.com
 
   
melissa pengelly   
Melissa Pengelly
melissapengelly@quiggpartners.com
 
   
nick white  
Nick White
nickwhite@quiggpartners.com
 
   
zoheb razvi   
Zoheb Razvi
zohebrazvi@quiggpartners.com
 
   

What's on the Block
International Transactions:  New Statutory Approval
Supreme Court
Court of Appeal
High Court

 

Takeovers Panel
Commerce Commission

QP Deals
Library
Conferences
Further Information
 

  WHAT'S ON THE BLOCK
  • NZ Yellow Pages - Business Directory

  • Metering services businesses

  • Wine Club business

  • Significant forestry estates

  • Liquor business

  • Product and design manufacture

  • Air conditioning and electrical services company

back to top

  • Building services business

  • Bathroom accessories business

  • Finance company

  • Magazine publisher

  • Significant stake in an IT consulting company

  • Small food manufacturing and distribution business

  • Commercial services business

  INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS:  NEW STATUTORY APPROVAL:  NZ
With the relatively new Overseas Investment Act 2005 we alert clients that international acquisitions, where there is a New Zealand business operated by the "target" MAY require consent from the New Zealand Overseas Investment Office.  This is a change from the previous Overseas Investment Act.  A paper detailing the circumstances of requiring such approval can be obtained from davidquigg@quiggpartners.com.  Such approval needs to be factored in timetabling the transaction.

back to top

  SUPREME COURT
Joint Venture/Fiduciary Duties:  The Supreme Court upheld a finding that the "joint venture" was of a fiduciary kind and gave rise to obligations of trust and confidence.  A fiduciary relationship did not require express agreement and may be implicit from the circumstances.  The leading judgment made some interesting general comments on joint ventures, concluding "In the absence of contractual regulation, equitable principles will supply the solution".

back to top

 COURT OF APPEAL
  • Schemes of Arrangement and the Takeovers Panel:  The Court of Appeal overturned a High Court judgment giving the Takeovers Panel status in respect of a scheme of arrangement and varying initial procedural orders for the scheme.  Most significantly the Court of Appeal "were inclined to" the view that the Panel had standing before the Court.  This means the Panel will be a more active player for parties seeking to use schemes of arrangements in New Zealand.  The Court also confirmed that the Panel involvement may include reviewing both initial orders and later final orders.  This point is important as any Panel involvement must include participation at the initial order stage to be meaningful.  However where the High Court varied initial orders adding a 50% majority by number requirement in addition to the 75% voting requirement the Court of Appeal held that was an error.  Although the Court of Appeal held that arguments were "closely balanced", it was persuaded by the possibility that a resolution could have a 75% vote in favour but still fall well short of a 50% majority by number.  This may be of interest to Australian practitioners who have always had the 50% by number requirement.  Another important feature was that the scheme vote was to be carried out by postal vote, not physical meeting.  The rationale to support postal voting was that the company traditionally had low shareholder participation.  It was seen that postal voting would hopefully lead to greater participation.

  • No Process Contract for a "tender process, albeit informal":  The Court of Appeal upheld a High Court decision to dismiss the claims in respect of a process contract on the sale of a substantial downtown property.  On the claimant's own evidence, the only requirement of prospective purchasers was that any offers be made by the stated deadline.  The Court of Appeal also made the point that an attempt to use a claim of negligence to make up for the lack of a process contract was rebuffed (upholding an earlier High Court decision).

back to top


  HIGH COURT

  • M&A Competition Law:  The High Court determined the appropriate penalty for breaching the Commerce Act prohibition for an M&A transaction substantially lessening competition in a market (and the unusual feature of holding a vendor liable as accessory).  The Court found that certain actions of the Commerce Commission contributed to the breach.  The Court held the Commission staff did "hint that [applicant] might consider withdrawing".  The vendor "accessory" received no pecuniary fine ("novelty" being a factor in the decision).

  • Confidentiality Agreement v NZX RulesIn injunction proceedings the High Court granted an injunction because disclosure would breach a confidentiality agreement.  The Court rejected various technical arguments seeking to limit the ordinary meaning of the word "information".  The court held that NZX Listing Rules did not override the confidentiality agreement as the three conditions (in LR 10.1.1(a)) required for overriding the confidential agreement were not met.  In particular the requirement that a reasonable person would expect the information to be kept confidential was established and rejected the argument that the Note to the relevant Listing Rule was prescriptive.

back to top

  TAKEOVERS PANEL
  • November Code Word:  The Panel highlighted that the passage of amendments to the Takeovers Act and Code have made some significant amendments:

(a)     the definition of Code Company was amended (dropping $20m asset test so that sole test is listing or 50 shareholders);

(b)     granting Panel jurisdiction to regulate “misleading and deceptive conduct” (called “truth in takeovers” in Australia);

(c)      expanding the Panels enforcement powers in line with the Commerce Commission;

(d)     increasing and broadening the Panels penalties and remedies again in line with the Commerce Commission.

NB:  Changes (a), (c) and (d) are operative now with (b) likely to be effective in early to mid 2007.

  • Voting Agreement:  The Panel have indicated it will question where a "voting agreement" (i.e. two shareholders agreeing to vote a particular way) is entered into means both "control the voting rights" of each other notwithstanding the agreed matters are not on "change of control" matters.  A formal meeting of the Panel to definitively decide the issue was not held after the parties agreed to terminate the voting commitment.

back to top

 
  COMMERCE COMMISSION
The Commerce Commission has recently approved mergers in respect of the following:
  • various forestry markets, in particular saw logs and pulp logs;

  • the market for the provision of log marshalling and stevedoring services at specific ports; and

  • coal mining and distribution market in the South Island.

back to top

  QP DEALS
Some deals Quigg Partners M&A Corporate assisted on in respect of NZ legal requirements:
  • the private equity consortium acquisition of Clear Channel Inc. (global deal);

  • Boeing's acquisition of Aviall, Inc. (global deal);

  • CVC's acquisition of DCA Group (trans-tasman deal);

  • Alinta/AGL infrastructure merger transaction (trans-tasman deal);

  • Linfox's acquisition of 50% of Task Transaction (and shareholders agreement) (New Zealand deal)

  • Cavotec's reverse takeover of Mooring Systems (New Zealand deal).

back to top

  LIBRARY
Quigg Partners prepared the New Zealand chapter of the ABA publications "International Stock Purchase Acquisitions:  Summary of International Law".  A copy of the publication may be ordered from www.abanet.org.

back to top

  CONFERENCES!
  • The 7th Annual Competition Law & Regulation Review has been set for 26-27 February 2007.  A copy of the programme can be downloaded at www.brightstar.co.nz.  Quigg Partners personnel are to speak at the Conference of "Merger and Acquisition Update:  NZ Bus and Mana Coach Services Decision".
  • The 6th Annual Mergers & Acquisitions Summit has been set for 12-13 March 2007.  A copy of the programme can be downloaded at www.conferenz.co.nz.  Quigg Partners personnel are to speak at the Conference on "Getting conquered by Australians or other foreigners:  Two deals dissected".

back to top

  FURTHER INFORMATION
M & A Corporate

David Quigg
John Horner
Matt Yates
Melissa Pengelly
Nick White
Zoheb Razvi
+64 4 474 0755
+64 4 474 0754
+64 4 474 0768
+64 4 474 0757
+64 4 474 0751
+64 4 474 0782
davidquigg@quiggpartners.com
johnhorner@quiggpartners.com
mattyates@quiggpartners.com
melissapengelly@quiggpartners.com
nickwhite@quiggpartners.com
zohebrazvi@quiggpartners.com
Employment

Michael Quigg
Sean Heywood
Deirdre Marshall
Jol Bates
Tim Sissons
+64 4 474 0766
+64 4 474 0752
+64 4 474 0765
+64 4 474 0759
+64 4 474 0758
michaelquigg@quiggpartners.com
seanheywood@quiggpartners.com
deirdremarshall@quiggpartners.com
jolbates@quiggpartners.com
timsissons@quiggpartners.com
     

Delete from Circulation List

If you receive our regular newsletters but would like to be deleted from our circulation list please advise by emailing theresacains@quiggpartners.com.

back to top